Re: Sixth Draft

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, josh(at)bitbuckets(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sixth Draft
Date: 2004-09-02 15:00:02
Message-ID: 20040902115807.P72978@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Simon Riggs wrote:

>> Josh Berkus wrote
>> 200 developers: We need to get a firm count from the patches
>> list before
>> going live with this. I'll ask Bruce.
>>
>
> IMHO we should count anybody that submitted a patch, whether ot not it was
> applied. That is a true measure of the size of the community, as well as
> being a clear statement that we have a quality gate that doesn't always let
> code in.

What about those testing, or contributing to discussions on
implementation?

There are currently 1135 ppl on pgsql-hackers ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-09-02 15:07:22 Re: Sixth Draft
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-09-02 14:36:58 Re: Sixth Draft