Re: Multicolumn Primary Key

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multicolumn Primary Key
Date: 2004-08-31 23:41:24
Message-ID: 200408311641.24089.scrawford@pinpointresearch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 31 August 2004 3:49 pm, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > On Aug 31, 2004, at 4:34 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >> Otherwise, have you VACUUM ANALYZEd recently?
> >
> > Argh! That seems to have been it. I have pg_autovacuum running,
> > so it didn't occur to me.
>
> pg_autovacuum only knows about table activity that has taken place
> while it's running. Example: Table A has an analyze threshold of
> 1000, if you perform 999 updates on table A, then kill and restart
> pg_autovacuum, you will have to perform another 1000 updates before
> pg_autovacuum performs an ANALYZE. This is a large limitation of
> the current implementation.
>
> I tried to fix this for 8.0, but my autovacuum improvements didn't
> make the cut.

As a quick-'n'-dirty "fix", what about a command-line option to
autovacuum that tells it to vacuum analyze all tables on startup? At
least it would start in a somewhat known condition.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-08-31 23:44:33 Re: Multicolumn Primary Key
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2004-08-31 23:36:55 Re: expected both swapped tables to have TOAST tables