Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>,Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Date: 2004-08-31 14:45:18
Message-ID: 200408310845.19017.pgsql@bluepolka.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Should the epoch snprintf format of the int64 pg_time_t timestamp be %lld 
instead of %d?

Ed


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2004-08-31 14:48:36
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-31 14:31:03
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group