Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,"elein" <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation
Date: 2004-08-27 14:28:45
Message-ID: 200408271628.45375.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Now is the right time to do it, so we can fix any issues uncovered.
>
> If we can then fix them all during beta, Reasoning can publish their
> results at same time as 8.0 goes production.

Quality assessment usually isn't about counting the number of bugs in a 
program.  It's about defining procedures and making sure they're 
followed.  This is usually difficult with open-source projects; I'll be 
interested to see what they have to say.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-08-27 16:34:23
Subject: Back on track -- 8.0 Press Release
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-08-27 12:05:35
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group