Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Date: 2004-08-27 18:51:50
Message-ID: 200408271251.50309.pgsql@bluepolka.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Friday August 27 2004 12:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> BTW, as long as we are taking Apache as the de facto standard --- does
> the default of "postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log" actually make sense, or
> would something different be closer to the common practice with Apache?

Apache defaults to access_log.N where N is the epoch of the logfile start 
time.

Ed


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-08-27 18:53:32
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-27 18:41:32
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group