Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 release warning

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 release warning
Date: 2004-08-27 02:08:59
Message-ID: 200408270208.i7R28x408038@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32


OK, release notes updated.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, current text suggestion is:
>
> Although tested throughout our release cycle, the Windows port does not
> have the benefit of years of use in production environments that
> PostgreSQL has on Unix platforms and therefore should be treated with
> the same level of caution as you would a new product.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > >> Rob Butler <crodster2k(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>> That makes it sound as if you didn't do the same level
> > >>> of testing on *this* release, like it didn't go
> > >>> through all the tests or something.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> How about "it does not have the extensive testing
> > >>> history that other supported platforms in this release
> > >>> have."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Not bad, but it doesn't make the point that there's a lot of new
> > >> platform-specific code for Windows in there. You want to point
> > >> out not only that there's no history, but that there's new code to be
> > >> suspicious of.
> > >
> > >
> > > "Altho tested throughout our release cycle, the Windows port does not
> > > have the benefit of the years of testing that has gone into the Unix
> > > platforms, and, as such, should be treated with the same level of
> > > caution as you would a new product"
> > >
> > >
> > Not bad. I think I'd say " ... does not have the benefit of years of use
> > in production environments that PostgreSQL has on Unix platforms ..." -
> > I agree with Merlin that we shouldn't imply it hasn't been extensively
> > tested.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > andrew
> >
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-27 02:09:18 pgsql-server: Update win32 comments.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-27 01:44:49 pgsql-server: Update: < This would require some background daemon to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-08-27 05:45:43 Re: contrib/start-scripts/linux on Debian
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-27 01:16:22 Re: [ppa-cvs] CVS: webdb/lang/recoded english.php,1.114,1.115

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Wyer 2004-08-27 07:10:02 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] 8.0 beta1 and XP SP2
Previous Message Oleg Letsinsky 2004-08-27 01:28:20 8.0 beta1 and XP SP2