Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions
Date: 2004-08-24 20:19:55
Message-ID: 20040824171846.I68447@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:

> I want to get rid of the recommendations-vacuum. I don't care if we 
> don't pick the ultimately best of everything that way. If there is a 
> consensus of people who use these things, repeating their recommendation 
> will seldom be bad advice. Those people have proven already that they 
> can make good decisions, they do use PostgreSQL after all :-)

Shouldn't some sort of automated voting system be created first?  With the 
ability to 'add software' and then 'vote on it'?  Maybe have some sort of 
login procedure such that someone could later login and change their vote? 
ie something better came along ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-08-24 20:24:56
Subject: Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions
Previous:From: Carlos MorenoDate: 2004-08-24 20:10:09
Subject: Re: Checking whether postgresql is running

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group