Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > Supported by *whom* exactly? It won't be the core committee; we have
> > more than enough to do managing the server itself.
> I don't doubt that for a second. What I'm suggesting must be staffed
> somehow. The core committee must be involved though or the whole idea
> falls apart. You *are* PostgreSQL (at least to me).
Have you seen the discussion about the MONEY type on the hackers list
today? We don't even have the manpower to _remove_ or _adjust_ an
existing data type that we know has been broken for perhaps +3 years.
How are we going to find time to do more about integrating and
supporting more software?
Answer me that and we can move forward.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Jim Wilson||Date: 2004-08-22 22:01:02|
|Subject: Re: How to setup default value "0000-00-00" for "date"|
|Previous:||From: Clodoaldo Pinto Neto||Date: 2004-08-22 20:33:20|
|Subject: Re: Python and 8.0 beta|