Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>,"Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date: 2004-08-18 15:55:21
Message-ID: 200408181755.21507.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> In the PG case a
> single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
> pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.

How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be 
working on including less stuff?

> The init script is a different matter.  That in principle could be
> taken from the upstream package.  I'm not sure if all the Linux
> distributions could agree on a single init script, though

That can be answered with a plain and simple "no".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-08-18 16:00:06
Subject: Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-18 15:46:25
Subject: Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-18 16:10:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Previous:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2004-08-18 15:30:05
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-08-18 16:06:05
Subject: Re: Problem analyzing performance of query
Previous:From: Marcel BoscherDate: 2004-08-18 15:42:08
Subject: Installing FullTextSearchTool tsearch2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group