Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>To be fair :) the only thing that makes Slony notable for PostgreSQL is
> >>that it is Open Source. There are other replication systems out there
> >>that have been working for some time.
> > Uh, and we are an open source project --- Slony being "open source"
> > seems like a very notable distinction to me.
> Thanks for pointing out what I already had :)
My point was that saying it is the "only thing" that makes it notable is
to minimize a major point of pushing Slony. It is "the" notable issue.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Robby Russell||Date: 2004-08-13 15:56:49|
|Subject: Re: Is it a worthy case study?|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2004-08-13 15:48:17|
|Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0|