Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list?
Date: 2004-08-12 02:04:05
Message-ID: 20040811230342.S62519@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:

> Don't ya think pgsql-sql-windows  is a bit overkill?  It's not like pg's 
> behavior re sql changes on windows.

hey, I'm just throwing out suggestions :)  and .. agreed, that one would 
be overkill ...


>
> Gavin
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> 
>>> Dave,
>>> 
>>>> That's a different issue altogether though (perfectly valid though). 
>>>> Is
>>>> there a more appropriate way to split the existing groups perhaps? I'm
>>>> opposed to shifting the windows users onto a platform specific group
>>>> just because there's a lot of them. I'm not opposed to shifting them 
>>>> if
>>>> we find there are lots of platform specific problems though.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Well, unfortunately, at least 70% of the Windows users can be counted on 
>>> not
>>> to differentiate platform-specific issues from general ones.  And given 
>>> the
>>> flakyness of the platform, I expect there to be continuous issues. 
>>> Also, I'd
>>> really rather not have a 25-post thread on PGSQL-SQL discussing how 
>>> XP-SP3
>>> breaks PostgreSQL.
>>> 
>>> While there are other possible lists we could add, the advantage of
>>> PGSQL-WINDOWS is that it would attract a substantial portion of the new
>>> users, which, for example, a list named PGSQL-INSTALL might not.
>> 
>> 
>> I'm not ant-pgsql-windows, but I fear that the one thing you are trying to 
>> avoid is going to happen if we do create it ... namely, all new windows 
>> users will subscribe to that one list and post everything under the sun to 
>> it, making that one list pretty useless :(
>> 
>> If anything, altho it might be long, let's do something like:
>> 
>> pgsql-general-windows
>> pgsql-novice-windows
>> pgsql-admin-windows
>> pgsql-sql-windows
>> 
>> or something like that ... so that its not just the one list ...
>> 
>> ----
>> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services 
>> (http://www.hub.org)
>> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 
>> 7615664
>> 
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>>      joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-12 02:27:10
Subject: Re: Request for download stats on release
Previous:From: Gavin M. RoyDate: 2004-08-12 01:59:14
Subject: Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group