On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:20:33PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am not sure if DocBook could handle generating an index covering
> > just functions, or if we'd have to merge it with the general
> > index.
> I think it's possible -- with a bit of programming work. I doubt,
> however, that it's going to be all that useful. We're already
> having trouble categorizing things like IS NULL (function?,
> operator?, special construct?).
For docs, redundancy is fine, at least at the output level :)
> A function index would be quite unreliable ("It's not in the
> function index, so it's not supported."). Feel free to add general
> index entries for all functions, though.
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-08-09 21:34:56|
|Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2004-08-09 21:20:33|
|Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions|