Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Date: 2004-08-09 16:57:33
Message-ID: 200408090957.33291.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Tom,

> Why would it matter?  I don't think I've ever once had occasion to use
> the -L switch in initdb, because it figures it out just fine for itself.
> People who are using it should be wizardly enough to know about the
> chdir.

Oh.  Then I have a different bug to report, because INITDB for Sunday's CVS 
would not run without the -L option.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-09 17:02:11
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-09 16:49:23
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-09 17:02:11
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-09 16:49:23
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group