Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date: 2004-07-31 22:34:47
Message-ID: 20040731223447.GA5080@dcc.uchile.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 12:02:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > We've also never had a single release before that had its version
> > > number jump determined by the number of features.
> >
> > That's a non-argument, Peter; we don't have any clear criteria for
> > version number jump.
> 
> Oh yes, we have very clear criteria: For patch releases, we increase the 
> third number, for feature releases we increase the second number and 
> set the third number to zero.  Clear enough?

What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before 7.0?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Vivir y dejar de vivir son soluciones imaginarias.
La existencia está en otra parte" (Andre Breton)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-07-31 22:43:32
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-07-31 22:25:20
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group