On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:32:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > There are some likely controversial changes; the Xid caches, in the
> > first place.
> No kidding ;-)
Ok, here is another try. This patch includes both the Xid cache
rewrite, source documentation (removed the big comment in xact.c and
added a README file), htup.h comments updated, and some user
BTW, the overflow bit is certainly a better approach than the negative
cache. I am not sure about locking w.r.t. the XidCache though.
Please take a look at it.
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Fabien COELHO||Date: 2004-07-29 05:22:59|
|Subject: Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4|
|Previous:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2004-07-28 21:09:43|
|Subject: Re: logger subprocess|