| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: win32 version info |
| Date: | 2004-07-26 22:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200407270016.42186.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I was originally thinking of somehow migrating the executable build
> rules into a single pattern rule, but given the lack of any suffix on
> executable names it's not clear how to use a pattern rule for the
> purpose.
You can write a rule for that using
%: %.o
but...
> And the existing rules are diverse enough that it might be
> a real pain to construct such a pattern rule anyway.
...is the problem.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-27 02:08:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-26 21:58:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend |