Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-07-21 18:02:38
Message-ID: 200407211802.i6LI2cW13698@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 11:33, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Guys who would contact Geoff Davidson about PostgreSQL (sorry Geoff)
> >>> know so little about us that it is not even worth the paper it is
> >>> printed on.
> >>
> >> Based on what do you jump to the conclusion that he "knows so little about
> >> us"? Geoff, surprisingly enough, has a mindset of (to my chagrin at
> >> times) techie first, businessmen second ... he knows *more* about us then
> >> the average salesman out there pushing any database knows, and most of
> >> that is from almost 5 years of having Thomas, Vadim and I beating it into
> >> him. In fact, from day 1, he had enough understanding of what OSS was,
> >> and how it worked, to know that to do anything that could/would harm it is
> >> "a Bad Thing", and in all his business dealings concerning PostgreSQL, he
> >> has striven(sp?) to take the "OSS ground" as required ...
> >>
> >> Based on your one sentence above, its easier for me to come to the
> >> conclusion that "you know so little about Geoff that I'm surprised you
> >> even wasted the bandwidth on it", then it is for you to come to *your*
> >> conclusion based on nadda ...
> >>
> >
> > easy now... Bruce was saying that the *reporter* knows so little about
> > us; not questioning Geoff's knowledge.
>
> Oops, apologies to Bruce here ... re-reading his original, you are
> correct ... I mis-read it the first (and second) time before responding ;(
> Sorry Bruce ...

No problem. Mistakes all around. :-)

I bet the "sorry Geoff" part thew you off. But in fact it seems they
wanted a company view and Geoff was a good choice.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-21 20:12:08 Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-21 17:42:49 Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL