| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assisting developers |
| Date: | 2004-07-14 07:32:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20040714073204.GA22020@zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:29:51PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am not sure what can be done to solve this in the future. There
> > are only a limited number of us who have the experience and time to
> > review and comment on very complex patches.
>
> The issue as I see it is not reviewing patches, but defining features.
You're right. The other problem is that about some features nobody
wants to talk over, because a feature is out of main stream interest or
almost nobody really understand a problem. In this case all start
discussion if something is already done and they try use it.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-07-14 07:56:23 | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-14 07:21:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |