Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Date: 2004-07-13 15:29:16
Message-ID: 200407131529.i6DFTGV28555@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Robert Bernier wrote:
>
>
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> >Unfortunately, and while IANAL, I think this is true, neither PgSQL Inc nor
> >PostgreSQL the project can now get trademark on the BEH since both have been
> >using it for so long. Of course, PostgreSQL the project isn't a legal
> >entity, and so it really can't have a 'trademark' per se.
> >
> >
>
> Whomever owns the trademark sets the rules, it's that simple. If you
> don't think this is a big deal then think about all those entities who
> do think this a big deal,
> http://www.google.com/search?q=trademark+disputes+&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

So Marc doesn't own it, PostgreSQL Inc does. Marc, if you ever sold the
company, what would happen to the PostgreSQL trademark? Marc, you do
own the company and not some mixture of people, right?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-13 16:15:44 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2004-07-13 15:24:04 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant