Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Kramer <josh(at)bitbuckets(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?
Date: 2004-07-12 21:24:03
Message-ID: 20040712182225.K867@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>>
>> Can anyone provide details on this? Were the servers misconfigured? I've
>> run into situations where the postgres server will stop responding if the
>> disk fills to capacity. We should prepare something to respond to this.
>>
>
> They were running 7.1 at the time. I doubt this would be a problem now.

If it was a problem then, they didn't let anyone know about it ... to the
best of my knowledge, the move to IBM/DB2 was an infusion of cash (ie.
bribe) from IBM, it wasn't anything technical ... but, again, I'd never
heard of any technical problems with the servers *shrug*

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roderick A. Anderson 2004-07-12 21:27:48 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-12 21:21:31 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant