> > What would be most interesting to see is whether this makes it wise to
> > increase shared buffer size. It may be more effective to bump down
> > the cache a little, and bump up sort memory; hard to tell.
> How do we go about scheduling tests with the OSDL folks? If they could
> do 10 runs with buffers between 1k and 500k it would help us get a broad
> view of the situation.
Yes. We'll need to. However, I'd like to wait until we're officially in
Beta. I'll be seeing the OSDL folks in person (PostgreSQL+OSDL BOF at Linux
World Expo!!) in a couple of weeks.
Aglio Database Solutions
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Jim Ewert||Date: 2004-07-12 16:59:05|
|Subject: Swapping in 7.4.3|
|Previous:||From: Rod Taylor||Date: 2004-07-12 14:38:08|
|Subject: Re: Working on huge RAM based datasets|