Re: ODBC Developers

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC Developers
Date: 2004-07-06 14:56:12
Message-ID: 200407061456.i66EuCI27917@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> > Sent: 06 July 2004 15:10
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC Developers
> >
> >
> > Using libpq seems like it would be a great solution. Why
> > didn't the original driver use libpq?
>
> No idea - that was back in the Postgres95 days (and possibly earlier).
> Certainly long before most of us were here...

My basic question was why _not_ convert it to use libpq? Seems it would
be smaller and easier to maintain.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message markw 2004-07-06 15:26:15 Re: ODBC Developers
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-07-06 14:36:20 Re: ODBC Developers