Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Nested Transaction TODO list

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
Date: 2004-07-03 21:22:40
Message-ID: 20040703212240.GA4323@dcc.uchile.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:03:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> Why does postgres.c discriminate against START TRANSACTION where it
> now allows BEGIN?  Could simplify code by just allowing all
> TransactionStmt types.

Why does START have a different Node from BEGIN anyway?  This seems to
be a leftover from when people thought they should behave differently.
They are the same now, so there's no point in distinguishing them, or is it?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Saca el libro que tu religión considere como el indicado para encontrar la
oración que traiga paz a tu alma. Luego rebootea el computador
y ve si funciona" (Carlos Duclós)


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-03 21:40:23
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2004-07-03 18:44:49
Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group