Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: jearl(at)bullysports(dot)com
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>,Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns
Date: 2004-07-01 17:23:10
Message-ID: 20040701172310.GA2908@wolff.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:38:02 -0600,
  jearl(at)bullysports(dot)com wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> 
> Yes, but if folks wanted to stick to the standard PostgreSQL would
> still work.  The only difference is that people who aren't concerned
> about being more tied to PostgreSQL would get some extra features.

Is there any provision in the information schema part of the standard for
vendor specific extensions?

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-01 17:30:59
Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-01 17:09:45
Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group