Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ODBC Developers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,<pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC Developers
Date: 2004-06-30 17:11:14
Message-ID: 200406301911.14609.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-odbc
Dave Page wrote:
> 3) An audit of the code for possible buffer overrun problems should
> be undertaken.

I'm planning to rip out all uses of the libc string functions and 
replace them by pqexpbuffer that is also used successfully in libpq.  
Look for a patch soon.

> Initially, any work that is undertaken should be supplied to the list
> as patches for review following any appropriate discussion. If the
> general concencus is that a patch is good, then I will apply it to
> CVS.

Maybe you can start by applying the 64-bit fix patch of the other day?


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-06-30 18:42:13
Subject: Re: PITR Error Message assistance
Previous:From: Jean-Denis GiguereDate: 2004-06-30 16:32:37
Subject: Re: grant execute on many functions

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Stergios ZissakisDate: 2004-07-01 06:52:14
Subject: Re: ODBC Developers
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-30 15:13:03
Subject: Re: ODBC Developers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group