Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Supported languages

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Supported languages
Date: 2004-06-30 23:48:31
Message-ID: 200406301648.31337.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Thomas,

> I guess that "production ready" is a somewhat fuzzy measure. What would
> it, in your opinion, take to claim that Pl/Java has reached it? Any
> advice on how to get there?

Well, it sounds like all you need is testing.   Also, it would have been nice 
if you'd brought this up a few weeks earlier.   If you tell Tom, tonight, 
that you want to move PL/Java into the main tree, I think the answer's going 
to be "no" just because it's 12 hours to feature-freeze.

Also, it will precipitate an argument about whether the PLs really belong in 
the main tree at all, or whether they should be seperate.   And that 
*definitely* won't wind up in 12 hours.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-07-01 00:39:11
Subject: Re: Supported languages
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-06-30 23:44:05
Subject: Re: Supported languages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group