Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Donnacha Mac Gloinn" <postgresql(dot)org(at)donnacha(dot)com>, "pgsql-advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Date: 2004-06-17 18:13:19
Message-ID: 200406172013.19527.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:
> My personal conjecture:
>
> The "extended insert" is not on the Postgres TODO list because:
> a) It's not ANSI SQL standard.
> b) We have COPY, which is better.

Unfortunately that statement is mostly wrong:
- It is on the TODO list.
- It is standard.
- It is better than COPY.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-06-17 18:45:49 Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-06-17 17:44:51 Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum