Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] The pgreplication project

From: Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] The pgreplication project
Date: 2004-06-08 16:09:38
Message-ID: 20040608160938.20962.qmail@web40002.mail.yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
Jan,

    The Top projects list is a dynamic list based on a cumulative page
views. Occassionally the ranking is scalled or zero'd to give newer
projects a chance to compete for the top rankings with older more
established projects. This last occurred a few months ago.

    Hope this answers your question.

Chris Ryan


--- Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/8/2004 11:04 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> >> On 6/8/2004 9:58 AM, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com wrote:
> >> 
> >> >> I guess I have to address a slightly broader audience, or do I
> conclude 
> >> >> from the total lack of interest in this matter that nobody
> cares if we 
> >> >> promote something here as one of our "top five" flagship
> projects, that 
> >> >> is inactive for years and still a prototype implementation
> against 
> >> >> PostgreSQL 6.4 with no ideas how to incorporate the semantic
> changes of 
> >> >> MVCC into the concept.
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Jan,
> >> > 
> >> > Perhaps you should contact the project admin or at least
> >> > posting to the project mailing list, before assuming the 
> >> > project is dead.  Admittedly there has been several
> >> > delays and periods of inactivity, but declaring a 
> >> > project dead without investigating is quite 
> >> > inappropriate.
> >> 
> >> I apologize and admit that it should have been posted to the
> project 
> >> mailing list.
> > 
> > I assumed the top-5 projects are dynamic based on the amount of
> > activity, not hardcoded as they seem to be.
> > 
> 
> Looking at "orapgsqlviews", which had the last CVS commit 3 years ago
> 
> and is still clinging to its top-5 position, I don't think so. Chris?
> 
> 
> Jan
> 
> -- 
>
#======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
> right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                
>  #
> #==================================================
> JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
> 



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: eleinDate: 2004-06-08 21:09:21
Subject: PostgreSQL BoF Session at OSCON
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2004-06-08 15:55:38
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2004-06-08 18:34:00
Subject: Re: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?
Previous:From: Scot L. HarrisDate: 2004-06-08 16:00:34
Subject: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group