Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Uh, why worry? If you had an application that depended in any way
> > shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ...
> Wasn't it a pg_upgrade consideration or something?
No. The issue was having applications hard-code type oids for
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-06-07 15:11:24|
|Subject: pgsql-server: Update date.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-06-07 13:33:42|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type |