Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Date: 2004-06-07 13:36:59
Message-ID: 200406071336.i57DaxF23545@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers 
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Uh, why worry?  If you had an application that depended in any way
> > shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ...
> 
> Wasn't it a pg_upgrade consideration or something?

No.  The issue was having applications hard-code type oids for
performance reasons.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-07 15:11:24
Subject: pgsql-server: Update date.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-07 13:33:42
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group