Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Does this complete this TODO item?
> > 	* Support composite types as table columns
> 
> Was "we surely cannot ship them like this" not clear enough?
> 
> >> If you dike out the preventive check in CheckAttributeType(),
> >> composite-type columns now seem to actually work.  However, we surely
> >> cannot ship them like this --- without I/O for composite types, you
> >> can't get pg_dump to dump tables containing them.  So a little more
> >> work still to do.

My question is whether we are getting closer to completing this item.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: pgsql-server: Make the world very nearly safe for composite-type at 2004-06-05 04:59:52 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: pgsql-server: Make the world very nearly safe for composite-type at 2004-06-05 05:18:56 from Tom Lane

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-06-05 05:18:56
	Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Make the world very nearly safe for composite-type
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-06-05 04:59:52
	Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Make the world very nearly safe for composite-type