Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: postgresql advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: 2004-06-04 19:20:47
Message-ID: 200406041220.47452.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-sql

Elein,

> In postgres and Illustra, references were possible.
> That is, storing the OID (REF) of a table in a column of another
> table achieving the same effect. SQL syntax support
> was needed for the REF type. I believe this was removed
> or suppressed in PostgreSQL.

Yeah, I'd like to see a return of table references as FKs. It would allow me
to eliminate all of these rather non-relational integer-based surrogate keys.

I don't think our OIDs would be the way to go on this, given the problems
already discussed with PG OIDs. I kinda like SyBase's solution, where they
have a system-acessable hash key of the data in the row.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Gigger 2004-06-04 19:28:07 Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-06-04 19:20:36 Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rein Petersen 2004-06-04 19:37:41 ANSI SQL-99 SYNTAX and "WITH"
Previous Message elein 2004-06-04 18:33:16 Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions