Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>,David Blasby <dblasby(at)refractions(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info
Date: 2004-06-02 16:53:55
Message-ID: 200406021653.i52Grvb05389@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:23:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > > If we go with a global CID counter then we don't have to add that step.
> > 
> > Seems Alvaro is already using a global counter.
> 
> I think I stated already that I'm in fact using it.  Not sure why it
> didn't show up in the list.

Yes, I saw it.  I wrote "seems" when I should have wrote it as a fact.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: pgsqlDate: 2004-06-02 17:54:57
Subject: Default Locale in initdb
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-06-02 16:46:37
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group