Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>,David Blasby <dblasby(at)refractions(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info
Date: 2004-06-02 16:46:37
Message-ID: 20040602164637.GD9227@dcc.uchile.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:23:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:

> > If we go with a global CID counter then we don't have to add that step.
> 
> Seems Alvaro is already using a global counter.

I think I stated already that I'm in fact using it.  Not sure why it
didn't show up in the list.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"¿Que diferencia tiene para los muertos, los huérfanos, y aquellos que han
perdido su hogar, si la loca destrucción ha sido realizada bajo el nombre
del totalitarismo o del santo nombre de la libertad y la democracia?" (Gandhi)


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-02 16:53:55
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-02 16:23:37
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group