Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: nested transaction patch build?

From: <roberthenkel(at)spymac(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: nested transaction patch build?
Date: 2004-06-01 18:53:45
Message-ID: 20040601185345.637C34C0D7@spy10.spymac.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Fair enough. <BR>
<BR>
I may be missing how some of the code release process and testing works for this project but here is my&nbsp;2 cents<BR>
<BR>
I understand your testing phase might not be in the scope of adding yet another area of failure at this time.&nbsp; However I do think it is bad practice to assume all users should test something and be expected to compile the code(NOT SAYING YOU DO, JUST A GENERAL THOUGHT).&nbsp;For most of us this is not a big deal, we can compile the code and patch it. However to get more people to use it, it must be made easier for people to get their hands on it.&nbsp; Microsoft doesn't have all the users they have by telling everyone to figure it out yourself.&nbsp; Is it really that hard to add this to the nightly build?&nbsp; Or do you see it just not that important at this point in time?&nbsp;And if so when will it be important?<BR>
<BR>
If the nested transactions does make it into the next release wouldn't be important to test this with the win32 code as well?<BR>
<BR>
So if someone else creates a build for win32 and includes nested transactions would you mind posting it with your win32 with no nested transactions so it can be in a central location for download?<BR>
<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Bob<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<B>On Fri, 28 May 2004 23:12 , Bruce Momjian &lt;pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us&gt; sent:<BR>
<BR>
</B>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #f5f5f5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><A href="javascript:parent.opencompose('Bob(dot)Henkel(at)hartfordlife(dot)com','','','')">Bob(dot)Henkel(at)hartfordlife(dot)com</A> wrote:<BR>
<FONT color=red>&gt; </FONT><BR>
<FONT color=red>&gt; </FONT><BR>
<FONT color=red>&gt; </FONT><BR>
<FONT color=red>&gt; </FONT><BR>
<FONT color=red>&gt; Any chance the win32 nightly build could also include a seprate build that</FONT><BR>
<FONT color=red>&gt; would include the nested transactions patch?</FONT><BR>
<BR>
No, we are too busy.<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
Bruce Momjian | <A target=_blank href="modules/refer.pl?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fcandle.pha.pa.us"><FONT color=red>http://candle.pha.pa.us</FONT></A><BR>
<A href="javascript:parent.opencompose('pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us','','','')">pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us</A> | (610) 359-1001<BR>
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road<BR>
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073<BR>
<BR>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------<BR>
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><hr>Msg sent via Spymac Mail - http://www.spymac.com


Attachment: unknown_filename
Description: text/html (2.5 KB)

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-01 19:07:35
Subject: Re: nested transaction patch build?
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-06-01 15:28:00
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] select like...not using index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group