From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | rama <nramakrishna7(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: statement level triggers in PostgreSQL , anybody?? |
Date: | 2004-05-31 22:10:03 |
Message-ID: | 20040531221003.GC436@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This has nothing to do with triggers, it has to do with not being able
to defer UNIQUE constraints. The classic solution is:
update SET column = -column;
update SET column = -column+1;
The problem is that you're trying to update the primary key, which is a
bad idea is most situations.
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 06:28:08AM -0700, rama wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a bit troubled with the row-level triggers which PostgreSQL
> uses when using update table cpmmand.
> For instance, if the primary key column has values 1,2,3,... and
> i want to update the whole column as column = colunm + 1 , then there
> is an error. This obviously works on databases such as mssql which has
> row level triggers.
> Any suggestions so that i do not have to modify the query and
> still make it work in the postgresql database ??
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Rosenberg | 2004-05-31 23:00:41 | Re: Poatgresql database on more than one disk |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2004-05-31 22:04:59 | Re: Does INSERT inserts always at the end ? |