Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

hash, rtree and gist ScanLists

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: hash, rtree and gist ScanLists
Date: 2004-05-28 04:05:41
Message-ID: 20040528040541.GA14068@dcc.uchile.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hackers,

I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction
abort.  Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however
it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were
Lists.  Is it OK if I change them to be so?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Uno combate cuando es necesario... ¡no cuando está de humor!
El humor es para el ganado, o para hacer el amor, o para tocar el
baliset.  No para combatir."  (Gurney Halleck)


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-05-28 04:40:14
Subject: Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2004-05-28 04:00:33
Subject: Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group