Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: running as a service?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: running as a service?
Date: 2004-05-16 19:49:07
Message-ID: 200405161949.i4GJn7P15709@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Dave Page wrote:
> It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said:
> > On Fri, 14 May 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What are the current plans regarding running PG as a service? A
> >> wrapper, or integrated code? If a wrapper, will it be put in the core,
> >> or done as something like a contrib or pgfoundry project?
> >
> > IF a wrapper, should be pgfoundry ... *but*, wouldn't integratd by
> > cleaner?
> >
> > would a wrapper be faster/easier?  maybe aim for that for 7.5, and full
> > integration for 7.6?
> 
> Service code is simple - Claudio already posted a wrapper, and I offered
> to provide an integrated solution as I did for autovacuum. (what happened
> to that btw - did it get applied?)
> Regards Dave.

It is hanging waiting to find out of pg_autovacuum will be integrated. 
If not, it will be applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Richard LuckhurstDate: 2004-05-16 23:23:39
Subject: Re: Runtime Problems
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-05-16 10:13:17
Subject: Re: Runtime Problems

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group