Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Prestige users

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Bruce <bruce(at)centerstage(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prestige users
Date: 2004-05-05 15:54:22
Message-ID: 20040505155422.GE22122@dcc.uchile.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Bruce wrote:

> It's an accounting application and I feel that Postgres would be the better 
> choice. Some other people (like my boss) thinks that MySQL would be better 
> choice. His reasoning is that MySQL gets more publicity so it must be 
> better. He says that since the Sabre airline reservation system and Yahoo 
> run with MySQL, they are the best. Period.

Is he pointy-haired?

> I'm sure Postgres has a couple prestige organizations that use database. If 
> I could come up with some big names, I'm pretty sure we could make everyone 
> into believers. Unfortunately, the only thing close to a "name" on the 
> website is the company BSAF.

Search archives.postgresql.org for this mail:

From: "Corey W. Gibbs" <cgibbs(at)westmarkproducts(dot)com>
To: postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Are we losing momentum? Answer:  Heck No!
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 07:52:43 -0700

Good luck,

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
www.google.com: interfaz de lĂ­nea de comando para la web.

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-05-05 16:12:36
Subject: Re: Prestige users
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2004-05-05 15:28:54
Subject: Re: Prestige users

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group