Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-04-30 05:11:12
Message-ID: 200404300511.i3U5BCI12959@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > But we don't want to have all our developers controlled by one feature
> > being completed.  It isn't fair.  They should get a good warning about
> > freeze starting.
> 
> Nor is it fair to extend the development cycle indefinitely waiting for
> that one feature in the first place ... there is *nothing* that states
> that the 7.6 dev cycle is nice and short for a change ...

Agreed.  I say we wait for _a_ major feature completed, or X major
features.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-04-30 05:27:10
Subject: Re: FW: Timezone library
Previous:From: zhuangjifengDate: 2004-04-30 04:59:09
Subject: How does postgres remain the unique index unique?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group