Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-04-30 04:58:21
Message-ID: 20040430015713.H45839@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:

> And if we always set deadlines independent of the required development
> time, then we may never get a win32 port or any other major feature that
> takes a little more time and attention.

Actually, that one doesn't hold ... it just means that we need to mature
our development environments to match the larger projects that need to
happen ... we are using CVS, there is nothing that stops a side-branch
being started, like we did with the Win32 stuff and then merging it back
up when the feature is ready ..

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: zhuangjifengDate: 2004-04-30 04:59:09
Subject: How does postgres remain the unique index unique?
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-04-30 04:56:44
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group