Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PITR Phase 1 - Code Overview (1)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR Phase 1 - Code Overview (1)
Date: 2004-04-28 15:03:46
Message-ID: 200404281703.46548.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Am Tuesday 27 April 2004 22:21 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > Why isn't the archiver process integrated into the server?

> You ask a reasonable question however. If pg_autovacuum exists, why
> should pg_autoarch not work also?

pg_autovacuum is going away to be integrated as a backend process.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-04-28 15:14:15
Subject: Re: PITR Phase 1 - Code Overview (1)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-04-28 14:49:57
Subject: Re: pg ANY/SOME ambiguity wrt sql standard?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group