On Wednesday 28 April 2004 13:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> I believe this is meant to be covered by this TODO item:
> * Allow DEFERRABLE UNIQUE constraints
> because the real issue is that the uniqueness check occurs immediately
> rather than being deferred till end of statement or transaction.
> Dunno when it will rise to the top of anyone's priority list...
> regards, tom lane
Thanks for everyones responses. I guess for now I will just need to find a way
around it. Looking forward to deferrable unique contraints though!
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Jeremy Godfrey||Date: 2004-04-28 15:29:43|
|Subject: Calling a function that returns a cursor using libpq|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-04-28 12:37:51|
|Subject: Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes |