Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-23 04:05:40
Message-ID: 20040423005745.K32445@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> OK, I think the number of files needed to build modules is small and I
> think can be installed by default in a /build directory. I am thinking
> that with a little script help, projects can build apps that look like
> like Makefiles used in our core project.

This is all I'm saying ... its like when we packaged up our first eRServer
... I didn't require our clients to go out and download PostgreSQL to
build it, I pulled in the few files from our build environment into the
package so that it could be built independently ...

Nice thing was, we were able to hit as many platforms as PostgreSQL did,
as building shared libraries and such was all there ready to go ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-23 04:09:45 What can we learn from MySQL?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-23 03:51:55 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions