Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-20 02:02:39
Message-ID: 200404200202.i3K22d610749@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
L J Bayuk wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > ...
> > OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl.  I just removed the docs for them.
> > 
> > Can someone comment on pgtclsh?  The README says:
> >...
> > 
> > Do we need to move that over to gborg?  If so, you can pull it out of
> > 7.4 CVS.
> > 
> > Anyone?
> 
> Already discussed:
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
> and
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

Great.  Thanks you.

I heard it wasn't needed, but couldn't remember if that was current
information or something old.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 03:46:57
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?
Previous:From: Sailesh KrishnamurthyDate: 2004-04-20 01:58:02
Subject: Position available at the Telegraph project

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Owens, SteveDate: 2004-04-20 16:39:11
Subject: Calling SQL functions from ECPG
Previous:From: L J BayukDate: 2004-04-20 01:40:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group