Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian),ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com (L J Bayuk),pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-interfaces),pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development),scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (Marc G(dot) Fournier)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-20 01:40:36
Message-ID: 200404200141.i3K1fWTl000834@mindspring.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> ...
> OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl.  I just removed the docs for them.
> 
> Can someone comment on pgtclsh?  The README says:
>...
> 
> Do we need to move that over to gborg?  If so, you can pull it out of
> 7.4 CVS.
> 
> Anyone?

Already discussed:
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
and
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Sailesh KrishnamurthyDate: 2004-04-20 01:58:02
Subject: Position available at the Telegraph project
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-04-20 01:37:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] locale issues on win32 (fix?)

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 02:02:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 01:14:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group