Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-20 00:00:39
Message-ID: 200404200000.i3K00de16142@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
L J Bayuk wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> > > there two of them there now?
> > 
> > I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no one know?
> 
> I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to.
> Never got it? It's in the archive:
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-04/msg00020.php

Yes, I saw that.  The issue is that the CVS history needs to be moved
over into one of the gborg TCL project histories.

Marc?

> > My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
> > libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.
> 
> I believe I have all the fixes, and I know I have none of the histories, in
> pgtcl-ng. I think both statements are also true about the Gborg pgtcl project.

Yea, we need to do that before removing from CVS.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 00:41:18
Subject: pg_encoding not needed anymore
Previous:From: L J BayukDate: 2004-04-19 23:50:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 01:14:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Previous:From: L J BayukDate: 2004-04-19 23:50:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group