Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-interfaces),pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-19 23:50:48
Message-ID: 200404192350.i3JNom6X000303@mindspring.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> > there two of them there now?
> 
> I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no one know?

I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to.
Never got it? It's in the archive:
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-04/msg00020.php

> My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
> libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.

I believe I have all the fixes, and I know I have none of the histories, in
pgtcl-ng. I think both statements are also true about the Gborg pgtcl project.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 00:00:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Previous:From: Ken AshcraftDate: 2004-04-19 22:14:09
Subject: Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-20 00:00:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-19 21:09:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group