| From: | L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-interfaces), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development) |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS? |
| Date: | 2004-04-19 23:50:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200404192350.i3JNom6X000303@mindspring.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces? Isn't it now on gborg? Are
> > there two of them there now?
>
> I am still waiting for an answer on this. Does no one know?
I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to.
Never got it? It's in the archive:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-04/msg00020.php
> My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
> libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.
I believe I have all the fixes, and I know I have none of the histories, in
pgtcl-ng. I think both statements are also true about the Gborg pgtcl project.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-20 00:00:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS? |
| Previous Message | Ken Ashcraft | 2004-04-19 22:14:09 | Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-20 00:00:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-19 21:09:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS? |