Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brett Schwarz <brett_schwarz(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-19 21:09:23
Message-ID: 200404192109.i3JL9No11952@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Brett Schwarz wrote:
> for the second part, yes, there are 2 on gborg: pgtcl
> and pgtclng
> 
My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-04-19 21:11:28
Subject: locale issues on win32 (fix?)
Previous:From: David BlasbyDate: 2004-04-19 20:41:11
Subject: Re: GiST -- making my index faster makes is slower

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: L J BayukDate: 2004-04-19 23:50:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Previous:From: Brett SchwarzDate: 2004-04-19 20:02:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group