Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Basic subtransaction facility

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>,Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date: 2004-04-18 17:51:21
Message-ID: 200404181751.i3IHpLh12770@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > If you want.  When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current
> > code, so it shouldn't affect anything.  However I posted mainly so
> > people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas
> > could see how it affects his two phase commit patch.
> 
> I have not reviewed it yet, but would like to do so before it goes in.

OK, thanks.  Yea, I think we should get it in rather than waiting for
Alvaro to finish the whole project.  This way, we have something in that
can't drift.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-04-18 17:55:15
Subject: Re: guc variables flags explicitly initialisation
Previous:From: ssingerDate: 2004-04-18 16:02:24
Subject: contrib/dbmirror

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group