Re: Basic subtransaction facility

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date: 2004-04-18 17:51:21
Message-ID: 200404181751.i3IHpLh12770@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > If you want. When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current
> > code, so it shouldn't affect anything. However I posted mainly so
> > people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas
> > could see how it affects his two phase commit patch.
>
> I have not reviewed it yet, but would like to do so before it goes in.

OK, thanks. Yea, I think we should get it in rather than waiting for
Alvaro to finish the whole project. This way, we have something in that
can't drift.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2004-04-18 17:55:15 Re: guc variables flags explicitly initialisation
Previous Message ssinger 2004-04-18 16:02:24 contrib/dbmirror