Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Gabriel Weinberg <yegg(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: 'Bruno Wolff III' <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug
Date: 2004-04-07 16:57:41
Message-ID: 20040407095413.Q69347@megazone.bigpanda.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Gabriel Weinberg wrote:

> Presumably, but that is not what I was doing.

I was responding to the part that was: "I would expect it to throw an
error immediately, instead of scanning the table for a value of a
different type." If say intcol = 4.345 is an error, is intcol = 4.0 an
error as well given that 4.345 and 4.0 are presumably the same type?  I'm
not sure what error you would expect.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Gabriel WeinbergDate: 2004-04-07 17:03:21
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug
Previous:From: Gabriel WeinbergDate: 2004-04-07 16:41:03
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group